美国康涅狄格论文代写:神哲学论证

Keywords: 美国康涅狄格论文代写

证明神存在的最持久的哲学论证之一，就是所谓的“设计论证”（1）这种说法有许多不同之处，但争论的核心在于宇宙的秩序过于有序而不是偶然导致的。在本文中，我会认为，这是不一定的情况下，但是，因为有其他的解释，可以解释外观设计。为此我将从设计参数的基本要求，然后我将探讨三项，严重怀疑它，因为他们怀疑宇宙以及组织设计参数要求（为什么有缺陷），进化是否可以考虑外观设计，无论是事实上，我们人类的能力，为了现实。因此有必要研究广泛的哲学文献，但本文的康德的工作而言尤为重要，他产生了一系列的有力的论据反对上帝的哲学论证的方式，人类的能力结构存在。这将表明，它是不可能令人信服地认为从宇宙外观设计神的存在，而不是寻找一个与我们通常会联想到上帝的属性，我们需要看没有进一步比我们自己和我们如何“设计”现实通过我们的智力能力。结合使用的反应提出对设计论证，这是特别好的一篇文章中以尼采为代表的，我认为它是这一经验展现给我们，给我们提供了智能设计的印象，而且这距离我们的表现使我们搜索一个现实的外部设计或创造者。

美国康涅狄格论文代写:神哲学论证

One of the most enduring philosophical arguments to prove the existence of God has been the so-called ‘argument from design’.[1] This argument has many variations, but the core of the argument rests with the claim that the universe is simply too well ordered to have resulted from chance. In this paper I will argue that this is not necessarily the case however, as there are other explanations which can account for the appearance of design. To do this I will set out the basic claims of the design argument, then I will investigate three counterclaims which cast serious doubt over it, as they question whether the universe is as well organised as the design argument claims (and why there are defects), whether evolution can account for the appearance of design and whether it is in fact our human faculties which order reality. It will therefore be necessary to investigate a wide range of philosophical literature, but for the purposes of this paper Kant’s work is particularly important as he produces a series of strong arguments against the philosophical proof of God and the way in which the human faculties structure existence. This will show that it is not possible to convincingly argue for the existence of God from the appearance of design in the universe, and rather than looking for a being with attributes that we would normally associate with God, we need look no further than ourselves and how we ‘design’ reality through our intellectual capacities. Using a combination of the responses put forward against the argument from design, which is particularly well represented in an essay by Nietzsche, I will argue that it is the way in which experience is represented to us that gives us the impression of intelligent design, and that it is this distance from our representation that causes us to search for an external designer or creator of reality.