美国乔治亚论文代写:运用定性比较方法
Keywords:美国乔治亚论文代写:运用定性比较方法
它们也是运用定性比较方法的一些缺点。Picciano(2004)指出了四个缺点。首先,对信息的分析过于依赖于研究者。此外,当研究人员完成他们的调查时,研究不能被复制,也不能将结果推广到任何其他情况。最后,由于结果没有统计上的呈现,一些研究人员会认为结果不足以提供有价值的证据,进而是对真相的攻击。由于社会比较方法的定性方法涉及因果关系的确定,比较学家在研究时倾向于采用比较史学研究。Mahooney和Ruechemeyer(2003)指出,这种方法是一种应用于社会科学的主要研究类型。比较史学研究者的主要兴趣是对特定的年代事件进行精确的调查。由于想要解释这些病例,经常可能导致额外的研究,超出了最初的研究对象。比较历史分析还包括对产生重大结果的基本结构的解释和认识,进一步研究人员清楚地检查过去的趋势,并在一段时间内获得变化。最后,因为比较历史研究者通常对所有的案例都很熟悉,他们能够基于理论分析来评估变量,并且当选择合理数量的案例时,合法性是可以实现的(Mahooney和Ruechemeyer 2003)。在教育领域进行比较历史研究的一个例子是Green和Wiborg(2004)关于“全面教育和教育不平等:国际视角”的研究。
美国乔治亚论文代写:运用定性比较方法
They are also some disadvantages in applying the qualitative comparative approach. Picciano (2004) identified four disadvantages. Firstly, the analysis of the information is too dependent on the researcher. Furthermore, when the researcher has completed their investigation the study cannot be reproduced nor can the results be generalised for any other cases. And ultimately, since the results are not presented statistically some researchers will view the results as insufficient to provide valuable proof and furthermore being an assault to the truth. Since the qualitative approach to social to comparative method involves determining causation compartivists tend to apply comparative historical research when investigating. Mahooney and Ruechemeyer (2003) noted that this approach is a primary type of investigation that is applied in the social science. The comparative historical researchers' primary interest is in enquiries which are precise to specific chronological cases. As a result of the desire to explicate these cases, frequently may result in additional research which extends beyond the initial subjects. Comparative historical analysis also involves explicating and recognising of fundamental configurations that create significant outcomes Furthermore investigators clearly examine past trends and obtains the changes over a time frame. And ultimately because comparative historical researchers typically are acquainted with all cases, they are able to they can assess variables based on theoretical analysis and legitimacy is achievable when a reasonable number of cases are chosen (Mahooney and Ruechemeyer 2003). An example of a comparative historical study in the field of education would be Green and Wiborg (2004) study on "Comprehensive Schooling and Educational Inequality: An International Perspective."