美国堪萨斯论文代写:因果关系

Keywords:美国堪萨斯论文代写:因果关系

洛克提出的因果关系的法律与这个相似的问题争执不休。洛克认为物体的感知的方式由我们的思想和实际的对象都是因果的方式联系在一起。他的理论的基础是,所有的对象是由我们的思想是理想化的任何原因,这个原因负责对象的存在在现实世界中。伯克利反对洛克的概念,说,如果这种因果关系存在的独立分析原因和影响。洛克的思想并不一定证明是错误的,如果考虑到伯克利的想法。伯克利倡导的理念是,不可能有因果关系之间的思想由我们的头脑和对象是真实的仍然是一个事实之间存在着因果关系在我们的想法和上帝。此外,洛克在他的代表现实主义理论否定的对象,我们在现实世界中不存在的观念。他只是否认我们的思想可以想象一个抽象的东西在现实世界中没有表示。还是这种差异的洛克的理论并不能使整个理论的缺陷。
美国堪萨斯论文代写:因果关系
The causality law presented by Locke is at loggerheads with this resemblance issue. Locke opines that the perception of the objects made by our mind and the objects in real both are linked together in a causal way. The basis of his theory is that all the objects that are idealized by our mind are for any cause and it is this cause which is responsible for the object’s existence in the real world. Berkeley opposes this concept of Locke and says that if such a causal relationship would have existed then the independent analysis of the cause and effects would have to be made.Locke’s ideas are not necessarily proven wrong if the ideas presented by Berkeley are taken in to account. The idea that Berkeley advocates is that there can be no causal relationship in between the ideas made by our minds and the objects that are real still it is a fact that there exists a causal relationship in between our ideas and God. Moreover, Locke in his theory of representative realism negates the idea that objects that we make perceptions of are not present in the real world. He just denies the idea that our mind can visualize an abstract thing that has no representation in the real world. Still this discrepancy of Locke’s theory does not make the entire theory flawed.