美国田纳西论文代写:马尔库塞

Keywords:美国田纳西论文代写

马尔库塞认为，在宽容的实践中，包容、公平、平等地参与一切讨论、倾听学习者的声音、制定适合不同学习风格的课程，在成人教育中至关重要。然而，这是否真的存在和接受的程度是什么呢？Brookfield强调马尔库塞的分歧为那些拥有激进的观点和叛逆的观点和“认为，这种宽容是专制，不自由。”（Brookfield，2002）虽然同意文学和马尔库塞思想的大多数，作为一个倡导倾听学生的声音，以表达自己的观点自由，是教育者让这个自私的改善自己的行为吗？然而，我也跟着别人的小提琴起舞，通过颁布纪律来保持时间、出勤、破坏性行为。这不是巧妙地被视为我的信仰矛盾，重新纳入公共话语的控制和压迫的自由也越来越多？”不知不觉地加强服务不公平的现状”（Brookfield，2002）认为，主流观点仍然掩盖了少数民族在实践！
美国田纳西论文代写:马尔库塞
In the practice of liberating tolerance, Marcuse identified to be inclusive, fair and equal to all - running discussions, listening to the voice of the learner and developing curricula to accommodate different learning styles, was of paramount importance in critical adult education. However, is this really in existence and to what level of acceptance is it? Brookfield highlighted Marcuse's disagreement for those who did possess radical opinions and rebellious perspectives and "argued that such tolerance is repressive, not liberating." (Brookfield, 2002) Although concurring with the majority of the literature and Marcuse's ideas, as an advocate of listening to the voice of the learners', with the freedom to express their viewpoints, are educators allowing this to selfishly improve their own practices? However, I too am dancing to the tune of somebody else's fiddle, by issuing a disciplinary for time keeping, attendance, disruptive behaviours. Could this not subtly be perceived as a contradiction to my beliefs, reasserting control over public discourse too, and constricting freedom more and more? "Unwittingly serving to reinforce an unfair status quo" (Brookfield, 2002) concluding that dominant mainstream perspectives still overshadow the minority in practice!