康涅狄格论文代写 假渠道研究

Keywords:康涅狄格论文代写

由于原来的假渠道研究（琼斯&在，1971），BPL已经越来越受欢迎的社会心理研究中减少社会期望偏差的影响。具体来说，内部效度的威胁中，BPL的条件是收集更真实的内省报告比控制条件在实验各个领域有用，如刻板印象和偏见（在页，1971），性别歧视（2003亚力山大和费舍尔），自我服务归因偏差（罗斯&贾米森，1993），内在与外在的道德动机（昆达&施瓦兹，1983），和其它敏感行为。作为一个对印象管理理论的重要方法，BPL也用于探索社会期望能人们印象中的另一个影响（个案，Kalle & Tedeschi，1978）。鉴于广泛的文献搜索，没有提出或发表的研究中，自我报告的反应对他们的访问印象管理对身体的吸引力使用BPL的措施，如参与者的体质指数，进行了。

康涅狄格论文代写 假渠道研究

Since the original bogus pipeline study (Jones & Sigall, 1971), BPL has been increasingly popular among social psychological studies to reduce influences of social desirability bias.  Specifically, among other threats to internal validity, the BPL condition is useful to collect more veridical introspective reports than in control condition in various areas of experiments, such as stereotyping and prejudice (Sigall & Page, 1971), sexism (Alexander & Fisher, 2003), self-serving attribution bias (Roese & Jamieson, 1993), intrinsic versus extrinsic moral motivation (Kunda & Schwartz, 1983), and any other sensitive behaviors.  As one of the crucial methods to impression management theory, BPL is also used to explore how social desirability could influence people’s impression on another (Gaes, Kalle, & Tedeschi, 1978).  Given an extensive search of the literature, no presented or published study that accesses the measures of self-reported responses toward their impression management on physical attractiveness using the BPL, such as participants’ BMIs, has been undertaken.