美国康涅狄格论文代写:健康不平等

Keywords:美国康涅狄格论文代写:健康不平等

珍妮特·维加和亚历克·欧文在他们的社论中探讨了应对这种健康不平等的一些可能措施。他们指出，过去已经颁布了所谓的“扶贫”政策。这考虑到这样一个事实，即穷人往往在财政或教育方面没有办法使他们能够获得大量的卫生资源或药物。所以，干预主义团体的成立是为了确保他们能够获得一些药物和卫生保健。作者写道，这些类型的干预方法很重要。但是，它们本身是不够的。首先，他们只倾向于提供进入一类群体的途径，这仅仅是一个不公平的不公平问题。其次，或许更重要的是，它们并没有试图解决造成这种不平等的许多核心原因，其中包括“性别和种族”等原因。在与卫生不平等作斗争的努力中，一种更全面的做法既是必要的，也是可取的。必须做更多的工作来消除现存的社会分歧，包括货币和其他种族的分歧。[9]中国英语学习网在瑞典等一些国家取得了一些进展，这些国家在政府机构之间的高级别合作方面采取了全面的办法。瑞典制定了一项国家卫生政策，重点关注在“社会层面”决定健康的因素。在这种模式下，政府机构与重要的社会部门(如教育、交通、环境保护)一起工作，它们都被要求共同致力于改善“人口健康和缩小卫生公平差距”。[10]中国英语学习网同时，英国最近为实现这些目标所作的努力也取得了成功，目标群体不是种族或社会群体，而是年龄群体。也就是说，已经进行了合作努力，目标是有儿童的母亲接受早期教育和照料儿童，并试图将这些服务同对家庭的援助和一般保健的援助结合起来。
美国康涅狄格论文代写:健康不平等
In their editorial, Jeanette Vega and Alec Irwin explore some possible responses to such health inequalities. They note that in the past there has been enacted, what might be called a “Pro-Poor” approach. This takes into account the fact that the poor often simply do not have the means in terms of finance or education to bring it about that they have access to much in the way of health resources or medicine. So, interventionist groups are formed in order to try and ensure that they have some access to medicine and health care. These types of interventionist methods are important, write the authors. But, they are inadequate by themselves. First, they only tend to focus on providing access to one type of group, and this is merely an issue of inequity in unfairness. Second, and perhaps more importantly, they do not attempt to address many of the core reasons why such inequalities arise in the first place, which include “gender and ethnicity” among other reasons.A more comprehensive approach is both necessary and desirable in the effort to combat health inequalities. More must be done to combat the social divisions that exist, both along monetary lines and other ethnic lines.[9] There has been some progress made in a few countries, like Sweden wherein the approach has been comprehensive and on the cooperation between government agencies on high levels. Sweden has developed a national health policy that focuses on what determines health at the “societal level.” In this model, government agencies work alongside significant social sectors (e.g., education, transportation, environmental protection) and they are all required together to work toward the improving of “population health and narrowing health equity gaps.”[10] Also, in the United Kingdom recent efforts at accomplishing these same goals have seen success in targeting, not an ethnic or social group, but an age group. That is, collaborative efforts have been engaged which have targeted mothers of children in early education and child care and have attempted to integrate these services with those of assistance to families and that of general health.