美国特拉华论文代写:相互竞争的社会群体
Keywords:美国特拉华论文代写:相互竞争的社会群体
在相互竞争的社会群体(阶级、性别、种族、宗教等)中争夺统治地位的斗争。当冲突理论家审视社会时,他们通过支配群体的权力、权威和胁迫来看到从属群体的社会支配。在冲突观中,统治群体中最强大的成员为社会的成功和机会创造规则,往往否定下属群体的成功和机会;这就确保了当权者继续垄断权力、特权和权威。你应该注意到,大多数冲突理论家反对这种强制,赞成更平等的社会秩序。有些人支持对社会主义进行一场彻底的社会经济革命(马克思),而另一些人则更倾向于改革主义,或者也许并不认为所有的社会不平等都源自资本主义制度(他们认为我们可以在不转向社会主义的情况下解决种族、性别和阶级不平等)。然而,许多冲突理论家把资本主义看作是社会不平等的根源。从冲突的角度看,造成社会问题的主要原因是统治者对下属群体的剥削和压迫。冲突理论家普遍认为压迫和不平等是错误的,而结构功能主义者则认为压迫和不平等是社会顺利运行和融合的必要条件。Structural-Functionalism因此冲突理论有不同的价值取向,但会导致类似的见解关于不平等(例如,他们都相信成见和歧视利益占主导地位的组织,但冲突论者认为这应该结束,大多数structural-functionalists相信下属应该歧视意义非凡,因为它是积极的社会结束)。冲突理论认为,社会变革是快速的、持续的、不可避免的,因为在社会阶层中,各个群体都在寻求彼此的替代。
美国特拉华论文代写:相互竞争的社会群体
A struggle for dominance among competing social groups (classes, genders, races, religions, etc.). When conflict theorists look at society, they see the social domination of subordinate groups through the power, authority, and coercion of dominant groups. In the conflict view, the most powerful members of dominant groups create the rules for success and opportunity in society, often denying subordinate groups such success and opportunities; this ensures that the powerful continue to monopolize power, privilege, and authority. You should note that most conflict theorists oppose this sort of coercion and favor a more equal social order. Some support a complete socioeconomic revolution to socialism (Marx), while others are more reformist, or perhaps do not see all social inequalities stemming from the capitalist system (they believe we could solve racial, gender, and class inequality without turning to socialism). However, many conflict theorists focus on capitalism as the source of social inequalities.The primary cause of social problems, according to the conflict perspective, is the exploitation and oppression of subordinate groups by dominants. Conflict theorists generally view oppression and inequality as wrong, whereas Structural-Functionalists may see it as necessary for the smooth running and integration of society. Structural-Functionalism and Conflict Theory therefore have different VALUE-ORIENTATIONS but can lead to similar insights about inequality (e.g., they both believe that stereotypes and discrimination benefit dominant groups, but conflict theorists say this should end and most structural-functionalists believe it makes perfect sense that subordinates should be discriminated against, since it serves positive social ends). Conflict theory sees social change as rapid, continuous, and inevitable as groups seek to replace each other in the social hierarchy.