美国密歇根州论文代写:自由市场经济和协调的市

Keywords:美国密歇根州论文代写

世界上的经济有两种类型：自由市场经济和协调的市场经济。在自由市场经济（LME），公司和他们的金融家之间的协调问题，员工，供应商和客户是通过市场机制解决（各种1990）。大中型工业企业是自由市场经济。他们还有一个特点是相对分散的工业关系制度，集体谈判在企业或工作场所发生（各种1990）。由于市场的主导地位，大中型企业通常表现出相对短期的和敌对的关系的经济主体，即政府和其他国际机构。在人力资源管理领域，企业在培训和发展方面的记录很差，雇员参与和参与的制度有限。在工会目前保持在手臂的长度的关系是对抗性的，主要集中在分配工资谈判（各种1990）。”虽然大中型工业企业的特点是短期的和敌对的关系，他们也具备这样的创新和经济的大容量安全比较优势开发新产品和新产业，尤其是以科学为基础的产业，如生物技术和电脑（日产2003，页18）。的一个例子是伦敦美国，但标签也适用于在澳大利亚，英国，印度，加拿大发现的资本主义经济形式，爱尔兰和新西兰。这篇文章会带来了印度经济的比较和对比功能（世界上最大的民主国家，英国（之一）世界的母系统）和美国（世界上最大的经济体）。这三个国家的就业条例是独一无二的。英国就业/劳动法规是基于普通法系，还诬陷法令（萨金特& Lewis，2006）。欧盟法律的影响在英国也很重要，以各种条约、宪章和“框架指令”的形式出现。美国的劳动制度建立在联邦和州法律的不同集合之上。联邦法律不仅规定了在私营部门组织工人权利的标准，而且推翻了试图管制这一地区的大多数州和地方法律。联邦法律还为联邦政府雇员提供更有限的权利（日产，2003）。然而，印度的劳动制度是完全基于宪法所规定的框架（bhattacharjea，2006）。印度有45多部国家法律和若干国家法律，规范着劳工制度。众所周知，印度的劳工制度非常严格，通常更为专业。
美国密歇根州论文代写:自由市场经济和协调的市场经济
The economies in the world are based on two types; the liberal market economies and the co-ordinated market economies. In liberal market economies (LME), the problem of coordination between firms and their financiers, employees, suppliers, and customers is solved through market mechanisms (Soskice, 1990). LMEs are free market economies. They are also characterized by a relatively decentralized system of industrial relations, with collective bargaining taking place at enterprise or workplace level (Soskice, 1990). Because of the dominance of the market, LMEs typically exhibit relatively short-term and adversarial relations between economic actors, i.e. the government and other international institutions. In the field of human resource management, there is a tendency for firms to have a poor record in training and development and to have limited systems of employee participation and involvement. Where trade unions are present they are kept at arm's length and the relationship is adversarial, focused mainly on distributive wage bargaining (Soskice, 1990). 'Although LMEs may be characterized by short-term and adversarial relations, they also possess a high capacity for innovation and economies of this kind secure comparative advantage by developing new products and new industries, particularly science-based industries such as biotechnology and computers' (Nissan 2003, pg 18). The prime example of a LME is the USA, but the label is also applied to the form of capitalist economies found in Australia, Britain, India, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand.This essay will bring out the comparative and contrasting features of the economies of India (the world's largest democracy), UK (one of the parent systems of the world) and the US (the world's largest economy). The employment regulations in these three countries are unique. The UK employment/labour regulations are based on 'common law' and also framed by the statute (Sargeant & Lewis, 2006). The influence of EU laws is also significant in UK in the forms of various treaties, charters and 'Framework Directives'. The US labour system is based on a heterogeneous collection of federal and state laws. Federal law not only sets the standards that govern workers' rights to organize in the private sector, but overrides most state and local laws that attempt to regulate this area. Federal law also provides more limited rights for employees of the federal government (Nissan, 2003). However, the Indian labour system is solely based on the framework set by the Constitution (Bhattacharjea, 2006). There are more than 45 national laws and several state laws which regulate the labour system in India. The Indian labour system is known to be very rigid and is generally more pro-worker.