美国印第安纳论文代写:讨论有影响

Keywords:美国印第安纳论文代写

小组的规模对讨论有影响。较小的群体，不到十岁，似乎更放松，愿意促进思想交流，或者在需要时畅所欲言。较大的组，包括非现场与会者，失去对讨论主题的关注，并开始侧边栏对话。这些侧边栏的谈话会分散注意力，限制思想交流和对主题的合理回答。我个人认为我在较小的群体中表现更好，需要他们的反馈来帮助我的表现。更大的团队对我来说是一个挑战，因为我并不总是知道球员是谁，他们通常是如何运作的。它似乎或感觉好像没有凝聚力或统一。我看到的交流网络，在这些会议上，利用我们出色的职业训练局系统，是车轮。在这种情况下，领导者被视为中心的人，或中心轮和所有的沟通和意见必须通过集线器或领袖（Tubbs，2009）。会议的负责人掌握了技术，而反应仅限于会议的负责人。其他外地用户似乎以同样的方式管理会议。我认为在使用这种技术时防止人们相互交谈是很有效的。生产性会议的能力与许多不同的因素有关。从会议室表的设置到会议的区域席位，这些影响可能有助于或阻碍集团的运作能力。一些组织已经非常熟练地使用了这项技术，我觉得它的使用给每个人提供了关于所讨论项目的更多反馈。虽然我们的领导层使用的是一个被称为“轮子”的限制性沟通网络，但对于使用这种技术的群体来说，这种做法似乎效果良好。
美国印第安纳论文代写:讨论有影响
The size of the group does have an impact on discussion.  Smaller groups, less than ten, appear to be more relaxed and willing to facilitate the exchange of ideas or speak up when required.  The larger groups, to include the offsite attendees, lose focus on the discussion topic and start sidebar conversations.  Theses sidebar conversations can be very distracting and limit the exchange of ideas and reasoned answers to topics at hand.  I personally think I perform better in the smaller groups and need their feedback to help my performance.  The larger groups are a challenge for me as I don't always know who the players are and how they normally function.  It appears or feels as if there is no cohesion or unity.The communication network that I see demonstrated during these meetings, using our wonderful VTC system, is the wheel.  In this case the leader is viewed as the central person, or hub of the wheel and all communication and comments must pass through the hub or leader (Tubbs, 2009).  The leader of the meeting is in control of the technology and responses are restricted to the leader of the meeting. The other offsite users appear to manage their meeting in the same fashion.  I think it works very well in preventing people talking over one another while using the technology. The ability to have productive meetings is related to many different factors.  From the setup of the conference room tables to your territorial seat at the meeting, these influences can contribute or impede the group's ability to operate.    Some organizations have grown very adept at the use of this technology and I feel that its use provides everyone with more feedback on the items discussed.  Although it appears our leadership is using a restrictive communication network described as the wheel, it seems to work well for the groups using this technology.