美国印第安纳论文代写:加缪小说

Keywords:美国印第安纳论文代写:加缪小说

加缪小说中的哲学可以与存在主义哲学相联系，存在主义哲学强调个人对自己所做的选择负有完全的责任，没有预设，也没有决定道德的至高无上的存在。这种哲学是对荒谬哲学的延伸，荒谬哲学认为，人类在一个没有意义、没有理性的世界中，是一个本质上的孤立存在的，人们能够接受在自己的环境中，一切都不能被控制，这就是默索的生活方式。在存在主义中，你认为有些事情是无法理性解释的，是无法控制的。《陌生人》是一本不同寻常的好书，它让我思考。书中的大部分内容让我觉得自己就像社会上的其他人一样，不接受默索的行为。然而，结局改变了这一切，进一步的分析给了我他行动的真正原因。当我第一次开始读这本书的时候，我立刻跳了进去，不想合上它，因为我从来没有读过这样的书。为了更好地理解它，我不得不回头读了几遍，每次我重读它，我都得到了不同的信息。默索是个有趣的人物，值得一读。他的想法和信仰似乎是错误的，但却是非常正确的。我能够理解加缪的哲学思想。事实上，我从来没有听说过存在主义或荒谬的哲学，直到我研究了作者，看他想告诉我们什么。默索能够接受每个人都会死去这一事实，并意识到这一点会让你过上更好的生活。他过着一种他控制并接受他所做的一切的生活。我不能说我了解他的一切，比如他是如何利用玛丽来达到性目的的，即使她告诉他她对他的爱和承诺。尽管如此，这个角色有最有趣的冲突让我一直在阅读。然而，我确实觉得第二部分拖拖拉拉，有点乏味。书的前半部分充满了行动，对于某些行动没有直接的理由。在后半部分，主要是作者对社会和生活的自我实现，我觉得作者本可以用另一种方式来探讨，比如缩短。我想把这本书推荐给那些喜欢在读完一本书后思考的人，甚至像默索这样的人。
美国印第安纳论文代写:加缪小说
Albert Camus’s philosophy in the novel can be related to the philosophy of existentialism, which stresses that the individual is solely responsible for the choices they make, there is no predetermination and there is no supreme being who decides morality. This philosophy is extended with the philosophy of the absurd, which states that human beings live an essential isolation in a meaningless and irrational world and people being able to accept that everything cannot be controlled in your environment, which is how Meursault live his life. In existentialism, you believe that there are some things that cannot be rationally explained and just happen out of your control. The Stranger was an unusually good book, which made me think. A majority of the book made me feel like the rest of society, which was not accepting Meursault’s behavior. However, the ending changed all of that and further analyzing gave me the real reasons for his actions. When I started reading the book for the first time I jumped in right away and didn’t want to close it because I never read anything like it. I had to go back a few times to re-read it to understand it better and every time I re-read it, I got a different message.Meursault was an interesting character to read about. His ideas and beliefs seem wrong but are very right. I was able to understand what Albert Camus was trying to say with his philosophy. In fact, I have never heard of existentialism or absurd philosophy until I researched the author to see what he wanted to tell us. Meursault is able to accept the fact that everyone dies and realizing this allows you to live a better life. He lives a life that he controls and accepts all his actions that he does. I can’t say that I understand everything about him, like how he uses Marie for sexual reasons even if she tells him her love and commitment to him. Nonetheless, this character had the most interesting conflicts that kept me reading. I do feel, however, that the second part dragged on and got a bit dull. The first half of the book was filled with action and there were no direct reasons given for certain actions. In the second half, it is mainly of his self-realization about society and life, which I feel, could have been approached another way by the author, like being shortened. I would recommend this book to anyone who enjoys thinking after reading a book or even coming to his or her own realization like Meursault.