美国爱荷华论文代写:哲学上的自杀

Keywords:美国爱荷华论文代写:哲学上的自杀

这是一种哲学上的自杀，加缪认为这是一种“羞辱的理由”。反讽试图削弱，甚至消除对意义的根本需求。反讽将对意义的需求降低为一种简单的人类欲望，这种欲望可以被修正或压制，至少在某种程度上如此。然而，意义不是欲望;相反，这是一种需要。我们需要意义，就像我们需要简单的生理需求，比如食物和水。我们不能对无意义的事情一笑置之，然后说:“我其实并不需要客观的意义。”这并没有像内格尔所说的那样解决荒谬的问题。这就避开了问题。讽刺就是对自己不诚实。尽管内格尔和加缪对世界都有各自的看法，但我认为加缪的观点更符合逻辑，对日常生活的解释也更好。
美国爱荷华论文代写:哲学上的自杀
This is the kind of philosophical suicide that Camus would consider to be a “humiliated reason.” Irony attempts to weaken, and even, therefore, eliminate the fundamental demand for meaning. Irony reduces the demand for meaning into a simple human desire, which can then be modified or suppressed, at least to some degree. However, meaning is not a desire; but instead is a need. We need meaning almost like we need simple physiological human needs like food and water. We can’t simply laugh off meaninglessness and say, “I didn’t really need objective meaning anyway.” That doesn’t solve the problem of the absurd as Nagel says it does. That escapes the problem. To be ironic is to not be honest with oneself.While Nagel and Camus each have their own point of view on the world, I believe that Camus perspective is far more logical and is better interpreted for everyday life.