美国佛罗里达essay代写:政治概念

Keywords:美国佛罗里达essay代写

虽然我们采取适当的时候注意变化的社会和政治概念,塑造了量刑的理想在现代,我们也应该注意的司法能力的国家本身后现代时代,控制犯罪已经成为日常生活的一个关键方面。这是斯坦·科恩曾被称为“净扩大”和“网格稀疏”,“人群一旦网络中溜走现在保留更长的时间,许多创新的替代品成为兼职教授等建立了制裁而言和罚款”(科恩,1985:33)。这是一个非常有用的现代刑事司法制度的批判和一个非常有用的先驱,2003年的刑事审判法量刑,无数的替代品而言和罚款已经由一个国家试点,越来越模糊了曾经明确区分合法和非法的,包括和排除在外,最重要的是——刑事司法系统和社区。因此,我们可以看到使用电子监控,罪犯在社区内的登记和实施“无薪工作”作为证据的延续,这些昔日的模糊边界之间的公民,国家的犯罪化和刑事司法系统,例如,婚姻、生育和就业创造了一个净当代刑事司法系统日益广泛。此外,分离的监护权+和-监护权的编码文本内的行动进一步证明熊的当代刑事司法系统已经侵犯了监护权和社区的概念在一分之二十世纪的十年。
美国佛罗里达essay代写:政治概念
While we have taken due time to note the changing social and political concepts which have shaped the ideal of sentencing in the modern era, we should also take note of the creeping judicial competences of the state itself in the post modern era whereby crime control has become a key aspect of everyday life. This is what Stan Cohen famously referred to as ‘net widening’ and ‘mesh thinning’ whereby “populations who once slipped through the net are now retained much longer; many innovative alternatives become adjuncts to established sanctions such as probations and fines” (Cohen, 1985:33). This is a highly useful critique of the modern criminal justice system and a highly useful precursor to the 2003 Criminal Justice Act where a myriad of alternatives to sentencing, probations and fines have been trialled out by a state that has increasingly blurred the once clear distinctions between the legal and the illegal, the excluded from the included and – crucially – the criminal justice system and the community. Thus, we can see the use of electronic monitoring, the registration of offenders within the community and imposition of ‘unpaid work’ as evidence of the perpetuation of the blurring of these erstwhile boundaries between the citizen, the state and the criminal justice system as the criminalisation of, for instance, marriage, parenthood and employment creates an ever widening net for the contemporary criminal justice system. Furthermore, the separation between ‘custody plus’ and ‘custody minus’ that is encoded within the text of the Act bears further testimony to the way in which the contemporary criminal justice system has impinged upon the concepts of both custody and community during the opening decade of the twenty first century.