美国威斯康星essay代写:护士受伤

Keywords:美国威斯康星essay代写

分配过程之前，由一个分诊护士受伤的初步检查。其次是评估的患者之一的研究人员，以验证适合试验。当患者被发现适合进入试验，并签署书面同意，他们被随机分配到一组。研究了配置方法（密封、编号中随机分配信封）但不提及任何方法都被用来平衡随机化。人口信息被收购的研究开始时（入院期间的病人），它被用来确定是否存在任何差异的研究组之间的研究不是一个盲目的审判，但所谓的公开审判。在这种情况下，受伤的病人，以及急诊护士执业或高级内务人员对待他们都知道的性质的研究。在这种特殊情况下，它是不可能进行单盲、双盲试验（LoBiondo Wood，2002）。患者满意度的测量采用问卷调查，患者被要求完成后立即治疗。虽然这个问卷减少观察偏见的情况下，评估的临床笔记的质量很难被认为是公正的，尽管使用一个既定的审计工具。
美国威斯康星essay代写:护士受伤
The process of allocation was preceded by an initial examination of the injured by a triage nurse. This was followed by the assessment of the patients by one of the researcher to verify suitability for the trial. When the patients were found suitable for entering the trial and signed a written consent they were randomized to one of the groups. The study describes the method of allocation (sealed, numbered envelopes that contained randomized allocations) however does not mention any method that would be used to balance the randomisation. Demographic information was acquired at the beginning of the study (during the admission of the patient) and it was used to identify whether any differences between the studied groups existed.The study was not a blind trial, but a so called open trial. In this case the injured patients as well as the emergency nurse practitioner or senior house officers treating them were aware of the nature of the study. In this particular case it was impossible to carry out a single blind or a double blind trial (LoBiondo-Wood, 2002). The level of patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire and the patients were asked to complete it immediately following the treatment. While this questionnaire reduces observes bias the case of the assessment of the quality of clinical notes can hardly be considered unbiased despite the use of an established audit tool.